#MAGICAVOXEL IMPORT INTO UNITY DRIVERS#

Oh really? I wonder if he really has read through the entire codebase of the operating system and all of the drivers and all of the programs he runs.

#MAGICAVOXEL IMPORT INTO UNITY CODE#

I would like to read the code that I run'. The author lays open the reasons why he does not want to release it and the other party just disagrees. Or, if you are inspired, go make your own and open source it!Д«y the way, that discussion is just horrible.

#MAGICAVOXEL IMPORT INTO UNITY FREE#

Don't give shit for the author for releasing the free tool on his own conditions. If someone creates a free tool for making art, their contribution should be cherished, and their tool used for art, and appreciated for it's artistic merits. If the author feels he is not contributing - or not willing to contribute - to the state of the art in voxel techniques or path rendering (both of which are totally fine stances) then there really is no value in showing the source. If you don't trust the author and are afraid that the code does something nasty - just don't use it. If you are interested on the path rendering part there's lots of awesome didactic resources for that as well. If you want to know how it's done just go and read some open source voxel library - there are ton's of them. When someone shares something, if you like it, be grateful, and if you don't, just move along.

So chunks makes sense for these reasons mainly.GitHub is among other things a platform for sharing. Plus, if you want a never ending world.you can continue to add 16x16 chunks when you get near the edge of a map but its hard to recreate the one megamesh and just add some area to an edge. The frustrum culling can easily discard any 16x16 chunks behind the camera and off to one side quickly and easily where as one single object would force all the trangles through hte GPU only for them never to be drawn. The fastest technique to render is ALL the cubes in one mesh but then that makes creating and destroying cubes slightly slower. GPU's want many vertices to process all at once.not 100,000 separate draw-calls (of 12 triangles each) AppGameKit would struggle to render 100,000 individual cubes (each as a mesh) at any sort of usable speed but put them all into one mesh and its much much faster. Quote: 'Would you say adding more cubes to a single mesh speed things up more or is 16 x 16 somewhat of a sweet spot? Anyway, not trying to hijack this thread.'ДЄdding many cubes to a single mesh makes it massively faster. For each cube it just has its position and color. But a GUI tool where models could be built from small cubes (probably options for the size) would be useful and each object is saved out in a simple format with the model name and list of cubes making it up. I mean sure it can be done but again it isn't efficient. I found it is too involved to do this stuff purely in code. It'd be cool to have a very simple voxel modeler that spits out a file that can be very easily loaded into AppGameKit with lists of the cubes making up the models. That being said though I have played around with this idea before of making everything out of tiny cubes (not THIS tiny as they are using) for the same reason. I mean it definitely looks great but aesthetically to me this completely loses the appeal of a voxel game as far as what people think of when they hear 'voxel game'. Very useful for destructible environments. I mean everything is already made up of hundreds or thousands of tiny cubes so no need to realtime split the geometry and so forth. to me it doesn't even look like a voxel game and seems like the reason they went with voxels was purely technical because this allows the objects to all be destroyed easily.

Magicavoxel import into unity